Today's hottest deals

Acer Nitro AN517-52

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics5.19% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAcer Nitro AN517-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Karoq_CMS
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200827
Uptime13.6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:21
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 21%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
62.2% Good
Memory 70.5
1-Core 89
2-Core 155
61% 105 Pts
4-Core 291
8-Core 465
46% 378 Pts
64-Core 486
30% 486 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 62.2%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 143F) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8280
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
5.19% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 3.7
Parallax 6.6
5% 5.43 fps
MRender 5.5
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 8.9
6% 6.77 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.19%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-512G-1014 512GB
408GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 21103900
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 926
Write 1,570
Mixed 1,107
271% 1,201 MB/s
4K Read 36.9
4K Write 93.4
4K Mixed 25.6
138% 52 MB/s
DQ Read 723
DQ Write 434
DQ Mixed 543
414% 567 MB/s
Poor: 116% Great: 217%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (18th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.7% Below average
MC Read 13.1
MC Write 10.5
MC Mixed 8.5
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 9.9
28% 9.73 GB/s
Latency 75.6
53% 75.6 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 17.3" 1280 720 BOE084E
Typical Nitro AN517-52 Builds (Compare 3,510 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Nitro AN517-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback