Today's hottest deals

Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (10th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 90 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics136% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X399 Professional Gaming  (all builds)
Memory26.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 0 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240118
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:21
Run Duration234 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$334
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.45 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 65.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
71% 130 Pts
4-Core 430
8-Core 862
76% 646 Pts
64-Core 2,289
142% 2,289 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
Asus(1043 895A) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
136% Outstanding
Lighting 146
Reflection 248
Parallax 205
119% 200 fps
MRender 335
Gravity 229
Splatting 181
195% 248 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 136%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 1TB
867GB free (System drive)
Firmware: VE0R840H
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 404
Write 421
Mixed 346
87% 390 MB/s
4K Read 24.3
4K Write 61.4
4K Mixed 32.4
111% 39.4 MB/s
DQ Read 166
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 201
157% 212 MB/s
Poor: 43% Great: 101%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
456GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 497
Write 452
Mixed 429
102% 460 MB/s
4K Read 30.7
4K Write 63.8
4K Mixed 41.6
134% 45.4 MB/s
DQ Read 382
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 306
247% 347 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$80
322GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 494
Write 455
Mixed 417
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 65.2
4K Mixed 40.9
135% 45.9 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 349
DQ Mixed 306
245% 344 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Mushkin Reactor 1TB-$50
818GB free
Firmware: N1007C
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 500
Write 397
Mixed 310
89% 402 MB/s
4K Read 23.4
4K Write 60
4K Mixed 32.1
108% 38.5 MB/s
DQ Read 275
DQ Write 297
DQ Mixed 198
173% 257 MB/s
Poor: 67% Great: 105%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$148
1.5TB free
Firmware: M3CR046
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 381
Write 451
Mixed 385
91% 406 MB/s
4K Read 34.6
4K Write 63.4
4K Mixed 43.9
142% 47.3 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 162
177% 298 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 124%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 4000 C18 2x16GB
2 of 8 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
75.8% Very good
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 37.1
MC Mixed 25.3
80% 27.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.3
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 27.1
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 113
35% 113 ns
Poor: 77%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 133%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 180 27" 1280 720 AOCB326 Q27G3XMN
Typical X399 Professional Gaming Builds (Compare 213 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock X399 Professional Gaming

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,098
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback