Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics74.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive296% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory7.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171101
Uptime20.3 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:20
Run Duration220 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-8100-$148
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
Memory 91.5
1-Core 110
2-Core 222
81% 141 Pts
4-Core 422
8-Core 428
57% 425 Pts
64-Core 424
26% 424 Pts
Poor: 53%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050-$243
CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 536.99
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
74.3% Very good
Lighting 100
Reflection 84.1
Parallax 88.3
82% 91 fps
MRender 82.4
Gravity 73
Splatting 66.1
60% 73.8 fps
Poor: 68%
This bench: 74.3%
Great: 78%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
664GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1215 1690 1942 2079 2081 2083 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
296% Outstanding
Read 1,700
Write 2,027
Mixed 1,568
SusWrite 1,848
404% 1,786 MB/s
4K Read 55.7
4K Write 102
4K Mixed 64.7
221% 74.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,256
DQ Write 866
DQ Mixed 990
758% 1,037 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 296%
Great: 623%
Seagate Barracuda 4TB (2017)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 170 170 171 173 171 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 77
Write 143
Mixed 65.7
SusWrite 170
83% 114 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 4.7
4K Mixed 0.6
200% 2.13 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 90%
Intenso USB 3.0 device 3TB
414GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 122
Write 109
Mixed 88.5
80% 107 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.9
172% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 91%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 3TB
218GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 107 106 107 106 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
38.2% Below average
Read 83.2
Write 74.2
Mixed 73.1
SusWrite 106
116% 84.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.6
54% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.2%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBD2 BLS8G4D26BFSC.16FBR2 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
88.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 34.2
MC Mixed 29.2
90% 31.5 GB/s
SC Read 18
SC Write 35.8
SC Mixed 26
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 64.6
62% 64.6 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 67 57 60 24" 1280 720 ACR053C Acer KA241
Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 10,803 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $421

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $830
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback