Today's hottest deals

User System

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.85% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemQIYIDA
MotherboardQIYIDA ED4
Memory24.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20230915
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:19
Run Duration107 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2680 v4
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
77.2% Very good
Memory 85.6
1-Core 101
2-Core 191
73% 126 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 727
65% 549 Pts
64-Core 1665
103% 1665 Pts
Poor: 67%
This bench: 77.2%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 2000
HP(103C 084A) 1GB
CLim: 625 MHz, MLim: 652 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Lighting 6.8
Reflection 9.2
Parallax 6.6
6% 7.53 fps
MRender 9.3
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 6.9
6% 8.03 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Purple 1TB (2014)-$60
865GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 137 137 141 139 136 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
81.2% Excellent
Read 144
Write 142
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 139
94% 128 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1
201% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 81.2%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA42GR7MFR4N-TF 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (100th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.6% Very good
MC Read 33.8
MC Write 27.6
MC Mixed 26.6
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 17.4
SC Mixed 17.7
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 75.3
53% 75.3 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 77.6%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 24.1" 1280 720 NEC68D5 EA244WMi
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback