Today's hottest deals

Acer Predator PH315-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics5.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAcer Predator PH315-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCFL Covini_CFS
Memory1.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200325
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 13:14
Run Duration134 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
77.3% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 118
2-Core 220
80% 141 Pts
4-Core 390
8-Core 506
57% 448 Pts
64-Core 492
30% 492 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 77.3%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Acer(1025 1343) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
5.6% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 4.8
Parallax 6.4
5% 5.73 fps
MRender 8.8
Gravity 5.9
Splatting 10.2
7% 8.3 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.6%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLB256 256GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 202Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,713
Write 1,395
Mixed 1,173
317% 1,427 MB/s
4K Read 43.6
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 51.3
169% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 682
DQ Write 486
DQ Mixed 573
431% 581 MB/s
Poor: 123% Great: 262%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$85
303GB free
Firmware: SVQ01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 341 286 81 82 82 81 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
77.4% Very good
Read 455
Write 408
Mixed 366
SusWrite 159
78% 347 MB/s
4K Read 26.8
4K Write 52
4K Mixed 34.3
112% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 356
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 320
241% 323 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR26D4S9S1KA-4 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.8% Above average
MC Read 19.6
MC Write 17.5
MC Mixed 14.9
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 19.1
SC Mixed 16.6
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 74.2
54% 74.2 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 50.8%
Great: 70%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 0G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 11% 28 189 56 144 15.5" 1920 1009 AUO82ED
Typical Predator PH315-52 Builds (Compare 4,076 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Predator PH315-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback