Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H AC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 145%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 132%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics139% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive339% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
10 months ago, 10 days ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-A520M DS3H AC  (all builds)
Memory8.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230608
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:57
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600-$126
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 91
1-Core 162
2-Core 306
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 623
8-Core 959
98% 791 Pts
64-Core 1,115
69% 1,115 Pts
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 107%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Gigabyte(1458 40CE) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
139% Outstanding
Lighting 193
Reflection 176
Parallax 175
158% 182 fps
MRender 235
Gravity 143
Splatting 122
131% 167 fps
Poor: 121%
This bench: 139%
Great: 139%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Lexar NM790 1TB
625GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11296
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2257 2250 1350 1040 673 624 MB/s
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
339% Outstanding
Read 2,772
Write 2,682
Mixed 2,415
SusWrite 1,366
518% 2,309 MB/s
4K Read 70.6
4K Write 163
4K Mixed 92.2
311% 108 MB/s
DQ Read 1,220
DQ Write 930
DQ Mixed 896
719% 1,015 MB/s
Poor: 260%
This bench: 339%
Great: 534%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CMH16GX4M2D3600C18 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 26.9
MC Mixed 36.3
98% 34.5 GB/s
SC Read 29.9
SC Write 26.9
SC Mixed 39.3
92% 32 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 55 25 165 27" 1920 1009 AOC2702 27G2G3
Typical GA-A520M DS3H AC Builds (Compare 368 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 87%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-A520M DS3H AC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $368
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback