Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics124% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive59.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PRO  (all builds)
Memory5.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230223
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:57
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$255
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Memory 69.5
1-Core 140
2-Core 295
88% 168 Pts
4-Core 546
8-Core 1,015
93% 781 Pts
64-Core 1,766
109% 1,766 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4060-$299
CLim: 3105 MHz, MLim: 4350 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
124% Outstanding
Lighting 170
Reflection 114
Parallax 153
138% 146 fps
MRender 199
Gravity 128
Splatting 104
113% 144 fps
Poor: 115%
This bench: 124%
Great: 127%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
17GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 240 149 186 171 174 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
59.6% Above average
Read 414
Write 166
Mixed 287
SusWrite 187
58% 263 MB/s
4K Read 29.3
4K Write 5.8
4K Mixed 38.5
97% 24.5 MB/s
Poor: 73%
This bench: 59.6%
Great: 130%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
736GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1196 1516 1158 1379 1199 1433 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
285% Outstanding
Read 2,262
Write 1,967
Mixed 1329
SusWrite 1,314
384% 1,718 MB/s
4K Read 27.8
4K Write 126
4K Mixed 69.8
198% 74.4 MB/s
DQ Read 1,219
DQ Write 1,083
DQ Mixed 1,094
836% 1,132 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 285%
Great: 410%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 1TB-$100
169GB free
Firmware: 1AA01113
SusWrite @10s intervals: 32 71 57 59 61 75 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 84.3
Write 101
Mixed 29.8
SusWrite 59.1
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 62%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
69.7% Good
MC Read 27.9
MC Write 24.4
MC Mixed 25.4
74% 25.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 14.9
SC Mixed 23.1
54% 18.8 GB/s
Latency 123
32% 123 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 57 144 27" 1280 720 AUS2702 VG279QL1A
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PRO Builds (Compare 818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 126%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 115%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PRO

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $530
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback