Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 49%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics51.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive75.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210710
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:53
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User EGY-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (69th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
91.6% Outstanding
Memory 94.6
1-Core 121
2-Core 242
86% 152 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 677
73% 578 Pts
64-Core 697
43% 697 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 91.6%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
Nvidia(10DE 11C2) 3GB
CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.5% Above average
Lighting 62.8
Reflection 65.1
Parallax 60.6
51% 62.8 fps
MRender 66.3
Gravity 64.8
Splatting 60.8
52% 64 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 128G 128GB
39GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HPS2227N
SusWrite @10s intervals: 389 378 399 388 243 41 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
75.7% Very good
Read 491
Write 402
Mixed 342
SusWrite 307
86% 386 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 82
4K Mixed 10.7
104% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 257
DQ Mixed 16.8
60% 128 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 79%
Seagate Barracuda 500GB (2016)-$28
153GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 156 158 154 157 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
83% Excellent
Read 132
Write 101
Mixed 75
SusWrite 157
85% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
161% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 83%
Great: 114%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3000 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
45.7% Average
MC Read 17.1
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 12.5
43% 15.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 14.8
SC Mixed 13.8
40% 13.9 GB/s
Latency 58.8
68% 58.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 59%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 36 3 60 21.5" 1280 720 DELF071 DELL SE2216H
Typical TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 863 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 52%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asus TUF H310M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 124% - Outstanding Total price: $239
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback