Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.61% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive248% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M7400QC
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1800 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230602
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:52
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900HX
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
52.4% Above average
Memory 71
1-Core 101
2-Core 98.8
58% 90.2 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 362
32% 273 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 98%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3050 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 1AB2) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 21.30.44.14
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
5.61% Terrible
Lighting 8.2
Reflection 5.3
Parallax 5.8
7% 6.43 fps
MRender 2.7
Gravity 5.4
Splatting 4.6
4% 4.23 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 5.61%
Great: 65%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFM001TD3JX013N 1TB
528GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 41000C20
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1206 1027 1152 1206 1214 1132 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
248% Outstanding
Read 2,166
Write 2429
Mixed 1,763
SusWrite 1,156
422% 1,878 MB/s
4K Read 53
4K Write 85.9
4K Mixed 71.2
217% 70 MB/s
DQ Read 608
DQ Write 374
DQ Mixed 487
364% 490 MB/s
Poor: 158%
This bench: 248%
Great: 338%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2E1 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
54.2% Above average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 19.9
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 16.9
SC Write 17.3
SC Mixed 16.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
Latency 85.3
47% 85.3 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 54.2%
Great: 84%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 30: 0P 0R 10G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
30% 48% 21 112 57 90 14" 1440 877 SDC4154
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M7400QC_M7400QC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback