Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 113%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 116%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive370% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2  (all builds)
Memory39.1 GB free of 48 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240410
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:52
Run Duration315 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7700X-$244
AM5, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 4.85 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 75.6
1-Core 190
2-Core 379
111% 215 Pts
4-Core 754
8-Core 1,201
120% 977 Pts
64-Core 1,798
111% 1,798 Pts
Poor: 99%
This bench: 108%
Great: 122%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$280
Device(7377 1401) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 556.12
Performing below potential (62nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 132
Reflection 121
Parallax 126
107% 126 fps
MRender 138
Gravity 109
Splatting 93.6
90% 113 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 101%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
224GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2785 1825 1817 1820 1836 1830 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
370% Outstanding
Read 2,658
Write 2760
Mixed 2,742
SusWrite 1,986
572% 2,536 MB/s
4K Read 57.6
4K Write 108
4K Mixed 70.2
234% 78.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,725
DQ Write 1,414
DQ Mixed 1576
1,178% 1,572 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 370%
Great: 477%
Samsung 870 QVO 2TB-$145
432GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 517
Write 194
Mixed 442
85% 384 MB/s
4K Read 38.5
4K Write 95.7
4K Mixed 52.1
176% 62.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 358
DQ Mixed 365
276% 369 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%
Patriot Burst 240GB
97GB free
Firmware: SBFM61.3
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 451
Write 375
Mixed 340
86% 389 MB/s
4K Read 37.2
4K Write 73.6
4K Mixed 38.4
144% 49.7 MB/s
DQ Read 271
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 206
179% 263 MB/s
Poor: 39% Great: 94%
Samsung 980 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$75
131GB free
Firmware: 1B4QFXO7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,659
Write 2,030
Mixed 1,795
410% 1,828 MB/s
4K Read 46.2
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 63.2
210% 73.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,732
DQ Write 1,428
DQ Mixed 1,553
1,170% 1,571 MB/s
Poor: 149% Great: 365%
Samsung 870 EVO 500GB-$53
264GB free
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 517
Write 157
Mixed 278
69% 318 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 23.3
4K Mixed 0.2
13% 7.83 MB/s
DQ Read 386
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 4.2
91% 222 MB/s
Poor: 73% Great: 130%
Samsung Portable SSD T5 1TB
212GB free
Firmware: 0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 420
Mixed 385
90% 404 MB/s
4K Read 21.5
4K Write 38.7
4K Mixed 27.1
88% 29.1 MB/s
DQ Read 255
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 140
122% 184 MB/s
Poor: 60% Great: 99%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -1 256GB
67GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.2
Write 80.8
Mixed 68.8
99% 78.9 MB/s
4K Read 4.7
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 3.4
225% 3.6 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 37%
Generic- USB3.0 CRW -2 32GB
28GB free, PID 0301
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 88.9
Write 19.4
Mixed 44.7
54% 51 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 2
140% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 31%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F5-5200J4040A24G 2x24GB
2 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
155% Outstanding
MC Read 55.7
MC Write 56.4
MC Mixed 56
160% 56 GB/s
SC Read 51
SC Write 52.5
SC Mixed 53
149% 52.2 GB/s
Latency 84.4
47% 84.4 ns
Poor: 117%
This bench: 155%
Great: 230%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 180 27" 1280 720 AUS27EF VG27AQ3A
Typical GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2 Builds (Compare 283 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 245%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 118%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 249%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650 GAMING X AX V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 121% - Outstanding Total price: $1,351
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback