Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 375%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 475%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 104%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics376% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive494% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME  (all builds)
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240902
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:52
Run Duration432 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5950X-$358
AM4, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Memory 84.6
1-Core 165
2-Core 326
102% 192 Pts
4-Core 660
8-Core 1,325
117% 993 Pts
64-Core 3,094
192% 3,094 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4090-$1,802
CLim: 3165 MHz, MLim: 5350 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
376% Outstanding
Lighting 589
Reflection 608
Parallax 843
480% 680 fps
MRender 558
Gravity 604
Splatting 285
375% 482 fps
Poor: 290%
This bench: 376%
Great: 402%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2883 3672 4055 4306 4366 3448 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
494% Outstanding
Read 2,535
Write 4,512
Mixed 3326
SusWrite 3,788
806% 3,540 MB/s
4K Read 78.9
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 111
356% 123 MB/s
DQ Read 1,243
DQ Write 1,004
DQ Mixed 1,108
834% 1,118 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 494%
Great: 587%
Samsung 980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$90
795GB free
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3575 3790 3694 3673 4055 3426 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
505% Outstanding
Read 3,868
Write 2,553
Mixed 2,396
SusWrite 3702
702% 3,130 MB/s
4K Read 53.5
4K Write 168
4K Mixed 55.9
241% 92.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,300
DQ Write 1032
DQ Mixed 740
670% 1,024 MB/s
Poor: 266%
This bench: 505%
Great: 477%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
764GB free
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3882 3877 3873 3853 3844 3677 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
527% Outstanding
Read 3,117
Write 4158
Mixed 3,312
SusWrite 3,834
817% 3,605 MB/s
4K Read 81.6
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 114
369% 128 MB/s
DQ Read 1,326
DQ Write 1,074
DQ Mixed 1,175
886% 1,192 MB/s
Poor: 286%
This bench: 527%
Great: 587%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$322
2.5TB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 441 433 444 440 437 MB/s
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 499
Write 445
Mixed 440
SusWrite 439
103% 456 MB/s
4K Read 41.8
4K Write 81.3
4K Mixed 53.5
175% 58.9 MB/s
DQ Read 226
DQ Write 188
DQ Mixed 205
154% 207 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 111%
Great: 137%
Samsung 870 EVO 4TB-$322
985GB free
Firmware: SVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 878 469 331 607 114 825 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 90% Great: 137%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 4000 C16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
131% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 44.1
MC Mixed 45.3
141% 49.2 GB/s
SC Read 29.3
SC Write 26.3
SC Mixed 43.5
94% 33 GB/s
Latency 74.8
54% 74.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 131%
Great: 146%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 144 26.9" 1280 720 AUS272A ROG XG27UQ
Typical GA-X570 AORUS XTREME Builds (Compare 674 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 207%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 248%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS XTREME

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $1,595
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $333Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback