Today's hottest deals

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EA_S433EA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics17.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive111% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EA_S433EA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X421EA
Memory3.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210707
Uptime1.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:51
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User SWE-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1165G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
63.5% Good
Memory 68.2
1-Core 136
2-Core 194
76% 133 Pts
4-Core 318
8-Core 470
49% 394 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 63.5%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe
Asus(1043 1262) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.101.3111
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
17.3% Very poor
Lighting 20.6
Reflection 24.6
Parallax 22.6
17% 22.6 fps
MRender 19.9
Gravity 30.7
Splatting 17.8
18% 22.8 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 17.3%
Great: 20%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme INTEL SSDPEKNW512G8 512GB
201GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 004C Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 260 54 104 50 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (30th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 717
Mixed 648
SusWrite 98.4
136% 611 MB/s
4K Read 40.8
4K Write 81.4
4K Mixed 50.8
170% 57.7 MB/s
DQ Read 334
DQ Write 220
DQ Mixed 340
237% 298 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 111%
Great: 207%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x8GB
2 of 8 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
65.5% Good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 26.5
MC Mixed 19.3
68% 23.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 28.3
SC Mixed 14.7
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 97%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 11: 0P 0R 2G 5B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
11% 16% 43 84 56 60 14" 1920 1057 NCP0035
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EA_S433EA Builds (Compare 239 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 17%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X421EA_S433EA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback