Today's hottest deals

MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (54th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 46 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics44.9% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (37%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C09
MotherboardMSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)  (all builds)
Memory4.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200609
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:48
Run Duration115 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 37%
Watch Gameplay: 1650 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (54th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-9100F-$115
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
77% Very good
Memory 84.5
1-Core 123
2-Core 245
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 400
8-Core 408
54% 404 Pts
64-Core 402
25% 402 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 77%
Great: 86%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.40
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
44.9% Average
Lighting 56.1
Reflection 57.8
Parallax 52.6
46% 55.5 fps
MRender 63.4
Gravity 51.3
Splatting 46.9
43% 53.9 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 44.9%
Great: 46%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS350 512GB
420GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.3.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 186 231 228 222 209 214 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
67.1% Good
Read 339
Write 258
Mixed 229
SusWrite 215
58% 260 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 22.7
101% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 194
DQ Write 258
DQ Mixed 194
156% 216 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 67.1%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 13.8
MC Mixed 11.1
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 11.5
SC Mixed 10.8
31% 10.9 GB/s
Latency 71.3
56% 71.3 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 39%
Great: 67%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 60 27" 1280 720 PHLC21A PHL 272V8
Typical H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09) Builds (Compare 6,690 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H310M PRO-VDH PLUS (MS-7C09)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback