Today's hottest deals

MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics88% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive63.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (14%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMSI MS-7A15
MotherboardMSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)  (all builds)
Memory4.1 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.1 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170421
Uptime4.6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:33
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 14%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400-$70
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 87.5
1-Core 96.3
2-Core 188
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 351
8-Core 366
48% 358 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 43%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
Nvidia(10DE 1F08) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88% Excellent
Lighting 110
Reflection 102
Parallax 105
90% 106 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 97.4
Splatting 89.1
84% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 88%
Great: 97%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Dexp C100 1024Gb 1TB
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0509A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 45 47 178 45 46 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
63.8% Good
Read 266
Write 127
Mixed 403
SusWrite 96.1
50% 223 MB/s
4K Read 31.5
4K Write 74.5
4K Mixed 23
117% 43 MB/s
DQ Read 264
DQ Write 309
DQ Mixed 38.2
98% 204 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 63.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
R748G2133U2S-U 04CB 12GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
50.4% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.5 GB/s
SC Read 12.7
SC Write 16.9
SC Mixed 15.2
43% 14.9 GB/s
Latency 78.5
51% 78.5 ns
Poor: 50%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 75 23.8" 1280 720 HWV2402 HUAWEI AD80HW
Typical H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15) Builds (Compare 2,394 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI H110M PRO-VD PLUS (MS-7A15)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $154
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback