Today's hottest deals

Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 48%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (65th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 35 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive177% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
6 days ago, 6 days ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME H310M-E R2.0  (all builds)
Memory12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200714
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:30
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (65th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 92.9
1-Core 123
2-Core 243
86% 153 Pts
4-Core 479
8-Core 694
73% 586 Pts
64-Core 702
43% 702 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-$150
Gigabyte(1458 4027) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
45.7% Average
Lighting 57.4
Reflection 59.3
Parallax 53.8
47% 56.8 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 47.3
44% 54.1 fps
Poor: 39%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 46%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
843GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 738 740 733 672 739 748 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
177% Outstanding
Read 683
Write 664
Mixed 633
SusWrite 728
153% 677 MB/s
4K Read 56.5
4K Write 99.9
4K Mixed 64.7
221% 73.7 MB/s
DQ Read 846
DQ Write 783
DQ Mixed 1,225
807% 951 MB/s
Poor: 249%
This bench: 177%
Great: 623%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
2TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 211 209 212 211 210 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 53% Great: 106%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB
36GB free, PID 1666, Kingston DataTraveler Kyson 128GB USB 3.2
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 41 41 41 42 26 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 11% Great: 55%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX KHX3200C16D4/8GX 16GB
2666, 2666 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
88.3% Excellent
MC Read 33.6
MC Write 35.3
MC Mixed 25.2
90% 31.4 GB/s
SC Read 18.5
SC Write 36.3
SC Mixed 25.8
77% 26.9 GB/s
Latency 62.1
64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 44%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 31: 0P 3R 3G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
31% 23% 56 214 57 60 23.8" 1920 1017 AOC2402 24G2W1G3-
Typical PRIME H310M-E R2.0 Builds (Compare 6,702 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus PRIME H310M-E R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 83% - Excellent Total price: $329
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback