Today's hottest deals

Asus Z170 PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 75%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 59%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics93.5% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsus Z170 PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160307
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:28
Run Duration266 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6600K-$93
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 107
2-Core 214
75% 133 Pts
4-Core 424
8-Core 428
57% 426 Pts
64-Core 428
26% 428 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$241
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.88
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
93.5% Outstanding
Lighting 122
Reflection 112
Parallax 113
99% 116 fps
MRender 130
Gravity 96.2
Splatting 85.3
83% 104 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 93.5%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB-$31
88GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 540 462 476 453 467 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,676
Write 957
Mixed 598
SusWrite 473
204% 926 MB/s
4K Read 32.4
4K Write 61.5
4K Mixed 42.7
136% 45.5 MB/s
DQ Read 826
DQ Write 270
DQ Mixed 406
337% 501 MB/s
Poor: 119%
This bench: 163%
Great: 243%
Kingston SKC3000D2048G 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1637 1373 1381 1839 2116 1713 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
208% Outstanding
Read 972
Write 2,100
Mixed 1,709
SusWrite 1,676
368% 1,614 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 99.1
4K Mixed 31.4
158% 58 MB/s
DQ Read 728
DQ Write 172
DQ Mixed 164
195% 355 MB/s
Poor: 278%
This bench: 208%
Great: 614%
Kingston SSDNow V300 120GB-$36
112GB free
Firmware: 505ABBF1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 133 127 127 125 127 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
50.1% Above average
Read 302
Write 151
Mixed 180
SusWrite 129
42% 191 MB/s
4K Read 10.6
4K Write 48.2
4K Mixed 23.8
72% 27.5 MB/s
DQ Read 175
DQ Write 152
DQ Mixed 122
103% 150 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 73%
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
7GB free
Firmware: 4PC10302
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 242
Write 130
Mixed 138
38% 170 MB/s
4K Read 17.6
4K Write 34.8
4K Mixed 21
72% 24.5 MB/s
DQ Read 137
DQ Write 65.9
DQ Mixed 61.5
56% 88.2 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 48%
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
559GB free
Firmware: 1AJ10001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 111 108 109 109 106 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.1% Excellent
Read 202
Write 30.1
Mixed 68.5
SusWrite 105
74% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
197% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 88.1%
Great: 75%
Seagate Barracuda Green 2TB-$89
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC3C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 119 118 116 116 116 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
68% Good
Read 121
Write 117
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 116
75% 103 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
132% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 38%
This bench: 68%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (34th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.5% Very good
MC Read 26.7
MC Write 28.6
MC Mixed 24
76% 26.4 GB/s
SC Read 15.6
SC Write 27.4
SC Mixed 22
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 83.2
48% 83.2 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 38 10 165 27" 1280 720 DEL4239 DELL S2722DGM
Typical Z170 PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 14,563 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 69%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 58%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asus Z170 PRO GAMING - $295

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $800
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback