Today's hottest deals

Asrock B360M Pro4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 80%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (74th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 26 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics81.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B360M Pro4  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180426
Uptime3.9 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:24
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User KOR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (74th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$152
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Memory 93.3
1-Core 128
2-Core 259
89% 160 Pts
4-Core 512
8-Core 853
83% 682 Pts
64-Core 857
53% 857 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing below potential (69th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
81.4% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 108
Parallax 99.5
83% 103 fps
MRender 92.6
Gravity 99.2
Splatting 95.6
78% 95.8 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
149GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 327 316 285 284 284 282 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 498
Write 454
Mixed 423
SusWrite 296
94% 418 MB/s
4K Read 37.3
4K Write 66.8
4K Mixed 46.5
151% 50.2 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 330
DQ Mixed 350
263% 352 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 101%
Great: 128%
HFS256GD9TNG-62A0A 256GB
161GB free
Firmware: 80001E00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 433 309 311 311 312 313 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,244
Write 566
Mixed 1,040
SusWrite 332
177% 796 MB/s
4K Read 37.8
4K Write 79.9
4K Mixed 50.4
164% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 640
DQ Mixed 644
478% 629 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 149%
Great: 163%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
658GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 173 172 171 172 173 MB/s
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
87.8% Excellent
Read 133
Write 142
Mixed 102
SusWrite 172
101% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
221% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 87.8%
Great: 109%
Seagate ST1000LM048-2E7172 1TB
793GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 119 119 118 127 121 MB/s
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
60% Good
Read 86.5
Write 79.4
Mixed 53.9
SusWrite 122
62% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
212% 2.1 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 60%
Great: 71%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CRC 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
MC Read 30.9
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 22.5
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 35.4
SC Mixed 25.3
75% 26.4 GB/s
Latency 61.5
65% 61.5 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 88%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 24" 1280 720 BNQ7F33 ZOWIE XL LCD
Typical B360M Pro4 Builds (Compare 1,262 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock B360M Pro4 - $21

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 95% - Outstanding Total price: $349
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback