Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16P6

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics3.7% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago.
SystemMicro-Star GL63 8RC
MotherboardMSI MS-16P6  (all builds)
Memory2.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180508
Uptime1.8 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 12:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 1.1 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
30.5% Below average
Memory 49.5
1-Core 71.5
2-Core 38
37% 53 Pts
4-Core 64.2
8-Core 88.1
10% 76.1 Pts
64-Core 83.3
5% 83.3 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 30.5%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 630
MSI(1462 1219) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
3.7% Terrible
Lighting 3
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 2.5
2% 3.97 fps
MRender 4.8
Gravity 4.7
Splatting 11.3
6% 6.93 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 3.7%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
721GB free (System drive)
Firmware: JB0OA3U0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 117 115 100 83 81 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
64.7% Good
Read 123
Write 119
Mixed 39.8
SusWrite 103
70% 96.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.5
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
22.6% Poor
MC Read 8
MC Write 8.5
MC Mixed 6.3
22% 7.6 GB/s
SC Read 3.7
SC Write 5.6
SC Mixed 4.9
14% 4.73 GB/s
Latency 94.3
42% 94.3 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 22.6%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 15 60 15.5" 1536 793 CMN15D6
Typical MS-16P6 Builds (Compare 1,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 65%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16P6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback