Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics45.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2  (all builds)
Memory3.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 11:58
Run Duration169 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770-$297
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770 CPU @ 3.40GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)
76.1% Very good
Memory 94.2
1-Core 96.9
2-Core 192
75% 128 Pts
4-Core 314
8-Core 468
49% 391 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 57%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E366) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1500 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 24.3.1
Performing below potential (56th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.1% Average
Lighting 53.6
Reflection 66.5
Parallax 76.2
44% 65.4 fps
MRender 67.4
Gravity 61
Splatting 50.2
48% 59.5 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 45.1%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kioxia-exceria SATA SSD 480GB
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFA18.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 184 113 114 114 114 114 MB/s
Performing below potential (8th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.3% Average
Read 141
Write 95.2
Mixed 104
SusWrite 125
26% 116 MB/s
4K Read 25.9
4K Write 48.1
4K Mixed 29.6
103% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 34.9
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 41.3
33% 45.9 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 47.3%
Great: 100%
V Series SATA SSD 240GB
27GB free
Firmware: V2.7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 174 127 80 81 78 56 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
34.7% Below average
Read 215
Write 187
Mixed 169
SusWrite 99.2
38% 168 MB/s
4K Read 19
4K Write 38.3
4K Mixed 10.3
62% 22.5 MB/s
DQ Read 24.2
DQ Write 63.4
DQ Mixed 12.5
18% 33.4 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 34.7%
Great: 91%
Samsung MZYTY128HDHP-000L2 128GB
28GB free
Firmware: MAT61L1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 133 136 135 137 122 MB/s
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
53.4% Above average
Read 223
Write 208
Mixed 180
SusWrite 140
42% 188 MB/s
4K Read 26.3
4K Write 47.6
4K Mixed 32.1
106% 35.3 MB/s
DQ Read 35.2
DQ Write 85.4
DQ Mixed 45.4
39% 55.3 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 105%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$24
175GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 43 43 43 44 43 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 73.8
Write 75.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 43.5
46% 62.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
174% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
32.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 10.1
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 9.6
SC Write 10.5
SC Mixed 9.5
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 61.1
65% 61.1 ns
Poor: 22%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 21 1 60 23" 1280 720 GSM59C6 2D FHD LG TV
Typical GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2 Builds (Compare 1,300 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H61M-S2PV REV 2.2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback