Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGigabyte AB350-Gaming 3
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF  (all builds)
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170407
Uptime5.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 11:48
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU6%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1500X-$111
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
68.2% Good
Memory 67.6
1-Core 112
2-Core 191
70% 123 Pts
4-Core 370
8-Core 580
59% 475 Pts
64-Core 498
31% 498 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 2012 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 555.99
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.1% Poor
Lighting 37
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 37.8
30% 38.5 fps
MRender 36.9
Gravity 37.3
Splatting 27.6
27% 33.9 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$25
41GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK71E0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 340 21 12 35 4.1 9.8 MB/s
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
26.5% Poor
Read 182
Write 104
Mixed 85.5
SusWrite 70.4
24% 110 MB/s
4K Read 15.8
4K Write 19.6
4K Mixed 10.4
48% 15.3 MB/s
DQ Read 14.1
DQ Write 15.4
DQ Mixed 14.5
11% 14.7 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 26.5%
Great: 100%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
125GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 180 176 184 187 189 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 172
Write 131
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 183
104% 142 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
166% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 102%
Great: 113%
WD Elements 1TB
2GB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 51.1
Write 50.7
Mixed 35.7
58% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.7
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
37% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 11.7
35% 12.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.9
SC Write 13.6
SC Mixed 12.5
37% 13 GB/s
Latency 103
39% 103 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 37%
Great: 64%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 39 10 60 24.1" 1920 1017 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF Builds (Compare 2,796 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 42%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AB350-Gaming 3-CF - $90

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $458
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback