Today's hottest deals

MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics188% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory24.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240715
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 11:01
Run Duration208 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 3600-$89
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 75
1-Core 140
2-Core 275
88% 163 Pts
4-Core 519
8-Core 861
84% 690 Pts
64-Core 1,057
65% 1,057 Pts
Poor: 73%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$751
Gigabyte(1458 4040) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (47th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
188% Outstanding
Lighting 272
Reflection 248
Parallax 281
222% 267 fps
MRender 317
Gravity 227
Splatting 168
186% 237 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 188%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN550 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
203GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 211070WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,580
Write 1,753
Mixed 1,364
350% 1,566 MB/s
4K Read 51.2
4K Write 175
4K Mixed 77.1
269% 101 MB/s
DQ Read 1,233
DQ Write 861
DQ Mixed 1,032
775% 1,042 MB/s
Poor: 164% Great: 276%
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
651GB free
Firmware: M6CR030
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 371
Write 354
Mixed 330
78% 351 MB/s
4K Read 28.1
4K Write 82.8
4K Mixed 25
118% 45.3 MB/s
DQ Read 150
DQ Write 198
DQ Mixed 38
67% 129 MB/s
Poor: 42% Great: 100%
Realtek RTL9210B-CG 2TB
561GB free
Firmware: 1.00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 637
Write 459
Mixed 503
118% 533 MB/s
4K Read 38.9
4K Write 72.7
4K Mixed 50.4
162% 54 MB/s
DQ Read 308
DQ Write 306
DQ Mixed 0
84% 205 MB/s
Poor: 51% Great: 81%
SanDisk Cruzer 4GB
4GB free, PID 5406
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.1
Write 8.7
Mixed 4.2
14% 14.7 MB/s
4K Read 10.2
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
38% 3.4 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
71.4% Very good
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 17.9
MC Mixed 28.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
SC Read 20.4
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 26.8
62% 21.6 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 68%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 113%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 144 31.5" 1280 720 GBT3202 AORUS FI32U
Typical X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 6,279 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI X570-A PRO (MS-7C37) - $165

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Outstanding Total price: $933
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback