Today's hottest deals

Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 123%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 99%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 118%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 93.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics129% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory25.3 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210802
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 11:00
Run Duration227 Seconds
Run User NOR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D-$196
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Memory 97.5
1-Core 122
2-Core 242
88% 154 Pts
4-Core 477
8-Core 898
82% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,172
73% 1,172 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$428
PNY(196E 138C) ≥ 4GB; pny
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
129% Outstanding
Lighting 163
Reflection 219
Parallax 214
132% 199 fps
MRender 252
Gravity 161
Splatting 132
143% 182 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 129%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg50znv256g KIOXIA 256GB
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP01AN00
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,274
Write 1,204
Mixed 1115
267% 1,198 MB/s
4K Read 56.4
4K Write 113
4K Mixed 70.5
236% 79.9 MB/s
DQ Read 876
DQ Write 678
DQ Mixed 753
570% 769 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 260%
Kingston SKC3000S1024G 1TB
797GB free
Firmware: EIFK31.6
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3646 4227 4239 3039 1636 1137 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
411% Outstanding
Read 2,442
Write 2,777
Mixed 2,990
SusWrite 2,987
634% 2,799 MB/s
4K Read 65.1
4K Write 151
4K Mixed 89.7
293% 102 MB/s
DQ Read 996
DQ Write 793
DQ Mixed 878
662% 889 MB/s
Poor: 237%
This bench: 411%
Great: 518%
Intel 520 Series 120GB-$270
20GB free
Firmware: 400i
SusWrite @10s intervals: 145 142 149 153 144 146 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
59.9% Above average
Read 442
Write 164
Mixed 208
SusWrite 146
53% 240 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 49.4
4K Mixed 37.1
74% 28.8 MB/s
DQ Read 200
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 186
137% 181 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 59.9%
Great: 88%
Seagate ST2000LM007-1R8174 2TB
332GB free
Firmware: SBK2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 54 54 54 52 54 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
33.5% Below average
Read 62.6
Write 66.1
Mixed 52.2
SusWrite 52.9
43% 58.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 4.2
4K Mixed 0.5
167% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 33.5%
Great: 67%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 3000 C15 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 50
MC Write 22.5
MC Mixed 39.5
107% 37.3 GB/s
SC Read 28.1
SC Write 22.2
SC Mixed 37.2
83% 29.2 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 104%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 46 10 165 27" 2560 1369 SAM72FC LS27CG51x
Typical B550 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 2,236 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock B550 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $748
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback