Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 70%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 83%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 64%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics84.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 8704
Memory9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200610
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 09:58
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10400F-$94
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
82.4% Excellent
Memory 87.9
1-Core 119
2-Core 237
83% 148 Pts
4-Core 415
8-Core 691
67% 553 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 82.4%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$140
HP(103C 8557) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 531.41
Performing below potential (17th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
84.6% Excellent
Lighting 107
Reflection 120
Parallax 105
87% 111 fps
MRender 120
Gravity 98
Splatting 81
80% 99.7 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 84.6%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC PC SN520 SDAPNUW-256G-1006 256GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 20120006
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,060
Write 1,071
Mixed 913
227% 1,015 MB/s
4K Read 38.8
4K Write 105
4K Mixed 54.8
184% 66.1 MB/s
DQ Read 856
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 723
557% 761 MB/s
Poor: 80% Great: 197%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
73GB free
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 100 100 100 101 102 100 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
76.6% Very good
Read 166
Write 155
Mixed 85.4
SusWrite 100
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
239% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 76.6%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB
462GB free, PID a207
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 106 107 106 107 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
41.6% Average
Read 88.2
Write 91.5
Mixed 35.6
SusWrite 106
108% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.6
83% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HP32D4U8S8HC-8X 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
75.3% Very good
MC Read 30.6
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.6
79% 27.6 GB/s
SC Read 13.1
SC Write 22.3
SC Mixed 18.8
52% 18.1 GB/s
Latency 65.4
61% 65.4 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.3%
Great: 100%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 91 58 240 24.5" 1280 720 HPN360E OMEN X 25f
Typical OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx Builds (Compare 3,833 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier

System: HP OMEN 25L Desktop GT12-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 119% - Outstanding Total price: $366
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback