Today's hottest deals

Asrock B760M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 108%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics126% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive193% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsrock B760M-C  (all builds)
MotherboardASRock B760M-C
Memory10.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230217
Uptime2.6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 09:45
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 3060-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600KF-$203
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Relative performance (0th percentile)
72.2% Very good
Memory 66.4
1-Core 104
2-Core 209
70% 127 Pts
4-Core 417
8-Core 849
74% 633 Pts
64-Core 1,683
104% 1,683 Pts
Poor: 118%
This bench: 72.2%
Great: 127%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti-$340
Gigabyte(1458 40E3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
126% Outstanding
Lighting 177
Reflection 170
Parallax 159
144% 168 fps
MRender 169
Gravity 128
Splatting 110
108% 135 fps
Poor: 116%
This bench: 126%
Great: 136%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata LEGEND 700 1TB
563GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1103L0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1536 763 1482 802 1348 942 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
193% Outstanding
Read 1,314
Write 1,375
Mixed 799
SusWrite 1,145
260% 1,158 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 15.2
140% 61.3 MB/s
DQ Read 812
DQ Write 596
DQ Mixed 468
414% 626 MB/s
Poor: 109%
This bench: 193%
Great: 283%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Gold Key Co Ltd NMGD516F81-5200N 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h 4800 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing as expected (48th percentile)
87.9% Excellent
MC Read 35.3
MC Write 32.3
MC Mixed 31.1
94% 32.9 GB/s
SC Read 17.8
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 23
66% 23.2 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 87.9%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 66 53 240 27" 1920 1080 AOC2702 27G2G8
Typical B760M-C Builds (Compare 115 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 148%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 119%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 170%
UFO

System: Asrock B760M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $612
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback