Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 86%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics80% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive314% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920x1080x4294967296 szín
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:54
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$335
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
90.9% Outstanding
Memory 76.6
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
90% 167 Pts
4-Core 563
8-Core 1,096
98% 829 Pts
64-Core 2,171
134% 2,171 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.9%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
Asus(1043 885B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 555.85
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
80% Very good
Lighting 102
Reflection 101
Parallax 92.1
84% 98.5 fps
MRender 99.9
Gravity 92.9
Splatting 79.7
73% 90.8 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 80%
Great: 81%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$105
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1400 1282 1271 1053 1031 799 MB/s
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
314% Outstanding
Read 2,530
Write 2,418
Mixed 1,761
SusWrite 1,139
440% 1,962 MB/s
4K Read 58.9
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 89.3
291% 104 MB/s
DQ Read 1,247
DQ Write 1,097
DQ Mixed 1,193
889% 1,179 MB/s
Poor: 214%
This bench: 314%
Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 3600 C20 Series 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
50% Average
MC Read 18.9
MC Write 16.7
MC Mixed 15.2
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 18.1
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 16.7
50% 17.6 GB/s
Latency 86.8
46% 86.8 ns
Poor: 38%
This bench: 50%
Great: 65%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 31.6" 1280 720 HPN365A HP 32f
Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE Builds (Compare 11,061 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 159%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE - $262

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 75% - Very good Total price: $1,317
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback