Today's hottest deals

Biostar IH61MF-Q5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (23rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 77 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.73% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive32.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardBiostar IH61MF-Q5  (all builds)
Memory7.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171024
Uptime1.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:52
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600-$133
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
67% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 77.6
2-Core 169
64% 110 Pts
4-Core 279
8-Core 439
44% 359 Pts
64-Core 437
27% 437 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 67%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Nvidia(10DE 118B) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 250 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 474.64
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
2.73% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 2.9
Parallax 3.7
2% 3.23 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 4.8
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.73%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
APS-SL3N-240 240GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: U0128A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 15 12 2.6 52 16 MB/s
Performing below potential (14th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
32.7% Below average
Read 217
Write 166
Mixed 182
SusWrite 47.6
34% 153 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 33.1
4K Mixed 14.8
63% 21.9 MB/s
DQ Read 21.4
DQ Write 67.9
DQ Mixed 19.9
22% 36.4 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 32.7%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
205GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 110 107 109 109 108 109 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)
72.9% Very good
Read 146
Write 130
Mixed 67.5
SusWrite 108
83% 113 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.7
139% 1 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 72.9%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-CK0 Micron 16JTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 16GB
1333, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
46.3% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 17.2
MC Mixed 15
47% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 13.4
SC Mixed 10.5
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 67.5
59% 67.5 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 46.3%
Great: 60%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 109 90 75 21.7" 1280 720 GSM5B55 LG FULL HD
Typical IH61MF-Q5 Builds (Compare 217 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Biostar IH61MF-Q5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $297
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback