| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good. |
| Graphics | 17.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20190813 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Oct 02 '24 at 08:52 |
| Run Duration | 123 Seconds |
| Run User | AUS-User |
| Background CPU | 22% |
PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
83%
Excellent
|
84% 149 Pts
|
60% 448 Pts
|
27% 441 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
AMD RX 570-$170
Sapphire(1DA2 E353) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1284 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 23.7.2
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
17.4%
Very poor
|
3% 48.4 fps
|
45% 56.4 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
73.9%
Very good
|
75% 26.1 GB/s
|
64% 22.5 GB/s
|
58% 69.4 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)
Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware
| Score | Hit Rate | Shots | EFps | 0.1% Low | Refresh Rate | Screen | Resolution | Monitor |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0% | 0% | 0 | 23 | 2 | 60 | 23.5" | 1280 720 | KGN2360 KAMN24FXCLA |
Typical GA-H310M S2V 2.0 Builds (Compare 680 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H310M S2V 2.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i3-9100FIntel $115Bench 80%, 34,310 samples | 239x |
| Core i5-9400FIntel $85Bench 85%, 299,482 samples | 214x |
| Core i3-8100Intel $148Bench 71%, 81,392 samples | 42x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| RX 570AMD $170Bench 45%, 473,685 samples | 63x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 50x |
| GTX 1650Nvidia $147Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 48x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 78% - Very good | Total price: $379 |