Today's hottest deals

Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 197%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 114%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 119%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics169% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive83.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4  (all builds)
Memory20.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211202
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:50
Run Duration184 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-12700K-$189
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Memory 92.2
1-Core 197
2-Core 393
120% 227 Pts
4-Core 783
8-Core 1,458
134% 1,120 Pts
64-Core 1,933
120% 1,933 Pts
Poor: 102%
This bench: 119%
Great: 123%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
169% Outstanding
Lighting 237
Reflection 325
Parallax 267
193% 276 fps
MRender 278
Gravity 212
Splatting 160
171% 217 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 169%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SSD 240GB
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFM61.5
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 48 146 106 35 83 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
83.9% Excellent
Read 457
Write 263
Mixed 341
SusWrite 73.7
63% 284 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 84.8
4K Mixed 42.2
158% 55.4 MB/s
DQ Read 262
DQ Write 300
DQ Mixed 203
174% 255 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.9%
Great: 95%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
60GB free
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 483 437 249 158 143 133 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
122% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 483
Mixed 412
SusWrite 267
93% 414 MB/s
4K Read 45.4
4K Write 138
4K Mixed 65.5
226% 82.8 MB/s
DQ Read 371
DQ Write 320
DQ Mixed 342
257% 344 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 122%
Great: 134%
WD Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)-$110
45GB free
Firmware: 111110WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,007
Write 2,297
Mixed 1,783
454% 2029 MB/s
4K Read 55.3
4K Write 264
4K Mixed 87.7
336% 136 MB/s
DQ Read 1,835
DQ Write 1,722
DQ Mixed 1,544
1,223% 1,701 MB/s
Poor: 168% Great: 297%
Pcie SSD 256GB
66GB free
Firmware: E8FM12.0 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 242 246 250 238 205 74 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 688
Write 266
Mixed 318
SusWrite 209
82% 370 MB/s
4K Read 32.8
4K Write 164
4K Mixed 32.8
179% 76.6 MB/s
DQ Read 412
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 307
237% 327 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 108%
Great: 214%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$47
160GB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 117 120 118 105 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
51.8% Above average
Read 62.5
Write 108
Mixed 60.4
SusWrite 118
64% 87.3 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.4
108% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 51.8%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C14-16GVK 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2667 MHz clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 38.6
MC Write 37.7
MC Mixed 36.8
108% 37.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.4
SC Write 42.4
SC Mixed 32.3
95% 33.4 GB/s
Latency 67.6
59% 67.6 ns
Poor: 92%
This bench: 105%
Great: 142%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 43 13 240 27.7" 1280 720 ACR0585 Acer XB272
Typical Z690 Phantom Gaming 4 Builds (Compare 1,021 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 163%
UFO

Motherboard: Asrock Z690 Phantom Gaming 4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $774
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback