Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-G5 MF5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics3.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-G5 MF5  (all builds)
Memory10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231103
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:47
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-13620H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 10 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 74.5
1-Core 161
2-Core 330
99% 188 Pts
4-Core 491
8-Core 796
79% 644 Pts
64-Core 1166
72% 1166 Pts
Poor: 93%
This bench: 83%
Great: 109%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Clevo(1558 A553) 128MB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5333
Relative performance (0th percentile)
3.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 5
Parallax 4.4
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 4.5
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 3.7
4% 4.47 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 3.32%
Great: 16%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte AG450E1024-SI 1TB
855GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ELFMH0.1
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,828
Write 3,661
Mixed 2380
593% 2,623 MB/s
4K Read 51.5
4K Write 153
4K Mixed 77.6
258% 93.9 MB/s
DQ Read 714
DQ Write 552
DQ Mixed 700
505% 655 MB/s
Poor: 258% Great: 383%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M425R1GB4BB0-CQKOL 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
122% Outstanding
MC Read 50.3
MC Write 46.4
MC Mixed 44.3
134% 47 GB/s
SC Read 17.5
SC Write 42
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.7 GB/s
Latency 115
35% 115 ns
Poor: 101%
This bench: 122%
Great: 136%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 13: 0P 0R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
13% 11% 63 224 20 60 15.5" 1280 720 CMN1521
Typical GA-G5 MF5 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-G5 MF5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback