Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics101% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
12 days ago, 12 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190603
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:47
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$170
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
85.9% Excellent
Memory 90.4
1-Core 129
2-Core 249
88% 156 Pts
4-Core 439
8-Core 700
70% 569 Pts
64-Core 926
57% 926 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 85.9%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8673) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
101% Outstanding
Lighting 123
Reflection 112
Parallax 128
100% 121 fps
MRender 175
Gravity 119
Splatting 103
105% 132 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 101%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
38GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 108 101 103 99 94 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
71.1% Very good
Read 466
Write 142
Mixed 156
SusWrite 104
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 27.4
4K Write 65.7
4K Mixed 30.6
116% 41.2 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 108
DQ Mixed 143
131% 208 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 71.1%
Great: 129%
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
72GB free
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 33 31 34 34 32 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
449% Outstanding
Read 4,937
Write 40.5
Mixed 75.9
SusWrite 32.8
264% 1,271 MB/s
4K Read 619
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 3.9
944% 208 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 449%
Great: 295%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$42
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64.2% Good
MC Read 25.4
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 19.7
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 14.2
SC Write 24.2
SC Mixed 20
56% 19.5 GB/s
Latency 63.1
63% 63.1 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 64.2%
Great: 104%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 9: 0P 0R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
9% 15% 33 215 57 165 27" 1920 1009 AUS2787 VG27VQ
Typical TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 530 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390M-PRO GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $594
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback