Today's hottest deals

MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 181%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive167% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C91
MotherboardMSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91)  (all builds)
Memory25.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20240723
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:46
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700X3D-$196
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
96.3% Outstanding
Memory 84.5
1-Core 146
2-Core 297
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 580
8-Core 1,001
96% 790 Pts
64-Core 1,372
85% 1,372 Pts
Poor: 85%
This bench: 96.3%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 4070-$500
CLim: 3120 MHz, MLim: 5250 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 565.90
Performing below potential (55th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 273
Reflection 256
Parallax 268
222% 266 fps
MRender 351
Gravity 238
Splatting 187
203% 258 fps
Poor: 161%
This bench: 193%
Great: 204%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
103GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR021 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 337 110 113 112 116 114 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
167% Outstanding
Read 1,543
Write 1,246
Mixed 1,092
SusWrite 150
224% 1,008 MB/s
4K Read 50.1
4K Write 85.8
4K Mixed 60.7
199% 65.5 MB/s
DQ Read 921
DQ Write 600
DQ Mixed 302
349% 607 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 167%
Great: 295%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
171GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 407 313 314 315 317 307 MB/s
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
108% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 485
Mixed 463
SusWrite 329
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 80.3
4K Mixed 50.2
164% 56 MB/s
DQ Read 388
DQ Write 362
DQ Mixed 371
280% 374 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 108%
Great: 129%
WD Purple Surveillance 2TB (2017)-$68
558GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 105 104 104 104 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
59.3% Above average
Read 102
Write 96.8
Mixed 48.9
SusWrite 104
64% 88 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 0.9
177% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 59.3%
Great: 104%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 35.2
MC Write 16.1
MC Mixed 29
76% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 26.1
SC Write 16.1
SC Mixed 28.8
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 71.6
56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 118%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 70 58 180 31.6" 1280 720 SAM750C Odyssey G5
Typical MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) Builds (Compare 18,184 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MAG B550 TOMAHAWK (MS-7C91) - $120

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $876
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback