Today's hottest deals

Casper NIRVANA ONE PC

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics2.06% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemCasper NIRVANA ONE PC  (all builds)
MotherboardINTEL MAHOBAY
Memory1.5 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130307
Uptime5.1 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:30
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470S
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 81.6
1-Core 86.2
2-Core 168
66% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 313
42% 313 Pts
64-Core 310
19% 310 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 630M
Device(1991 5584) 1GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 450 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
2.06% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 0.7
2% 2.53 fps
MRender 4.1
Gravity 3
Splatting 2.2
2% 3.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.06%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$18
244GB free (System drive)
Firmware: KC45
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 26 75 26 70 72 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
36.9% Below average
Read 77.9
Write 67
Mixed 55.7
SusWrite 50.7
46% 62.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.7
115% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 36.9%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M2S2G64CB88G5N-CG 830B M2S4G64CB8HG4N-CG 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
39.1% Below average
MC Read 13.4
MC Write 13.7
MC Mixed 12.2
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.5
SC Write 13.5
SC Mixed 12
35% 12.3 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 57 60 14.5" 1280 720 NVD0800 Nvidia Default Flat Panel
Typical NIRVANA ONE PC Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Casper NIRVANA ONE PC

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 9% - Terrible Total price: $52
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback