Today's hottest deals

Infinix ZERO BOOK 13

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics18.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive310% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemInfinix ZERO BOOK 13  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault EM_IDL822_V2.0
Memory19.2 GB free of 32 GB
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20230610
Uptime6 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 08:25
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-13900H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
89% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 168
2-Core 316
98% 186 Pts
4-Core 560
8-Core 908
90% 734 Pts
64-Core 1,333
82% 1,333 Pts
Poor: 84%
This bench: 89%
Great: 115%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Xe Graphics
Device(0100 2782) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5081
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
18.5% Very poor
Lighting 22.2
Reflection 27.1
Parallax 26
18% 25.1 fps
MRender 22.6
Gravity 31.4
Splatting 18.9
19% 24.3 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 18.5%
Great: 23%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee XP2100F001T 1TB
826GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1.1.17
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2185 2395 2399 1970 1897 1835 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
310% Outstanding
Read 2,448
Write 2,459
Mixed 1,919
SusWrite 2,114
503% 2,235 MB/s
4K Read 54.2
4K Write 128
4K Mixed 31.6
191% 71.4 MB/s
DQ Read 862
DQ Write 380
DQ Mixed 132
228% 458 MB/s
Poor: 116%
This bench: 310%
Great: 401%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung 8x4GB
8 of 8 slots used
32GB Row of chips 23h 6400 MHz clocked @ 5200 MHz
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
152% Outstanding
MC Read 58.3
MC Write 64.3
MC Mixed 56.2
170% 59.6 GB/s
SC Read 17.9
SC Write 48.9
SC Mixed 27.7
90% 31.5 GB/s
Latency 94.9
42% 94.9 ns
Poor: 109%
This bench: 152%
Great: 158%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 5: 0P 1R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
5% 25% 4 212 57 60 15.5" 1536 864 KDB0526
Typical ZERO BOOK 13 Builds (Compare 37 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 110%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

System: Infinix ZERO BOOK 13

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback