Today's hottest deals

HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 76%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 72%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics115% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive200% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 87C3
Memory13.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210823
Uptime7 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 04:54
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$165
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
65.4% Good
Memory 55
1-Core 116
2-Core 227
70% 132 Pts
4-Core 410
8-Core 572
62% 491 Pts
64-Core 907
56% 907 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 65.4%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6700-XT-$480
ASRock(1849 5210) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 12GB, Driver: 24.8.1
Performing below potential (9th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
115% Outstanding
Lighting 128
Reflection 122
Parallax 267
104% 172 fps
MRender 223
Gravity 142
Splatting 180
148% 182 fps
Poor: 113%
This bench: 115%
Great: 129%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 2TB
290GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2QGXA7
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1143 1198 1418 1300 1300 1248 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
200% Outstanding
Read 1,122
Write 1,304
Mixed 633
SusWrite 1268
244% 1,082 MB/s
4K Read 17
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 27
97% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 1,266
DQ Write 896
DQ Mixed 1036
786% 1,066 MB/s
Poor: 256%
This bench: 200%
Great: 506%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$30
873GB free
Firmware: MS2OA8L0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 161 168 163 161 169 165 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 129
Write 151
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 164
83% 116 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
148% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 107%
WD easystore 2648 2TB
1.5TB free, PID 2648
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 55 61 58 46 57 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
32.2% Below average
Read 55.7
Write 57.9
Mixed 37.8
SusWrite 55.4
70% 51.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 3.9
4K Mixed 0.3
144% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 32.2%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3600 C18 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
49.6% Average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 15.7
MC Mixed 20.5
52% 18.3 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 12.1
SC Mixed 16.6
40% 14 GB/s
Latency 168
24% 168 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 49.6%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 165 31.5" 1280 720 GSM5BD3 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx Builds (Compare 5,577 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 178%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 177%
UFO

System: HP OMEN 30L Desktop GT13-0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $966
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback