Today's hottest deals

Asus SABERTOOTH X58

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 66%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics28.8% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive39% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
1 month ago, 13 days ago.
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH X58  (all builds)
Memory16.4 GB free of 24 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20101221
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 04:19
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 26%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing way below expectations (15th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7 960-$220
LGA1366, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.35 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
57.4% Above average
Memory 79.2
1-Core 76.9
2-Core 119
57% 91.7 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 341
32% 268 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 76%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
28.8% Poor
Lighting 37.3
Reflection 35.1
Parallax 31.8
30% 34.7 fps
MRender 32
Gravity 38.8
Splatting 25.8
26% 32.2 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 28.8%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
T-force 240GB 240GB
109GB free (System drive)
Firmware: W0110A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 110 60 47 31 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
39% Below average
Read 288
Write 171
Mixed 206
SusWrite 62
40% 182 MB/s
4K Read 20.2
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 17.5
71% 24 MB/s
DQ Read 31.2
DQ Write 61
DQ Mixed 24.4
25% 38.9 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 39%
Great: 102%
T-force 1TB 1TB
813GB free
Firmware: V1103A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 118 147 153 163 172 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
38.9% Below average
Read 283
Write 168
Mixed 205
SusWrite 144
45% 200 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 25
4K Mixed 12.5
56% 18.4 MB/s
DQ Read 26.5
DQ Write 61.6
DQ Mixed 20.1
22% 36.1 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 38.9%
Great: 109%
Seagate FireCuda HDD 1TB
666GB free, PID 204b
Operating at USB 3.2 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 118 121 120 123 118 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
42.6% Average
Read 86.8
Write 92.9
Mixed 77
SusWrite 120
131% 94.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
67% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 42.6%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 6x4GB
6 of 6 slots used
24GB DIMM
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
35.7% Below average
MC Read 12.4
MC Write 11.4
MC Mixed 13.1
35% 12.3 GB/s
SC Read 8.1
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 8.3
24% 8.3 GB/s
Latency 73.7
54% 73.7 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 35.7%
Great: 61%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 15% 47 133 27 180 23.8" 1920 1017 GSM5C91 LG ULTRAGEAR
Typical SABERTOOTH X58 Builds (Compare 1,712 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH X58

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $380
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $275WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback