Today's hottest deals

Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 43%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive163% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX506LI
Memory4.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
DisplayΧρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Χρώματα 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211126
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 03:48
Run Duration178 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (52nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-10300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
82.6% Excellent
Memory 89.9
1-Core 125
2-Core 231
84% 149 Pts
4-Core 412
8-Core 559
61% 485 Pts
64-Core 499
31% 499 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650-Ti (Mobile)
Asus(1043 1E91) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 560.94
Performing below potential (68th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
44.1% Average
Lighting 54.9
Reflection 61.8
Parallax 52.7
45% 56.5 fps
MRender 62.8
Gravity 48.8
Splatting 47.9
43% 53.2 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 44.1%
Great: 47%
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1E91) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7985
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
5.78% Terrible
Lighting 6
Reflection 8.7
Parallax 7
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 10.2
Gravity 6.2
Splatting 10.6
8% 9 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 5.78%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2210_MTFDHBA512QFD 512GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P6MA001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 354 220 54 61 18 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
163% Outstanding
Read 1,577
Write 909
Mixed 727
SusWrite 127
184% 835 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 69.5
236% 81.2 MB/s
DQ Read 602
DQ Write 250
DQ Mixed 72.5
147% 308 MB/s
Poor: 102%
This bench: 163%
Great: 247%
Intenso SCSI 1TB
65GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.7 7.2 4.8 1.3 5.1 6.7 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
19% Very poor
Read 60.6
Write 73.4
Mixed 43.9
SusWrite 5.3
34% 45.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 19%
Great: 77%
TOSHIBA EXTERNAL_USB 2TB
262GB free, PID 0901
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 49 50 48 50 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
30.7% Below average
Read 127
Write 145
Mixed 21.1
SusWrite 50
108% 85.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 0.4
4K Mixed 0.7
40% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 30.7%
Great: 53%
Intenso USB 3.0 Device 1TB
283GB free, PID 55aa
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 38 42 42 48 49 36 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
25.8% Poor
Read 70.9
Write 57.1
Mixed 48.2
SusWrite 42.5
71% 54.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 1
104% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 25.8%
Great: 49%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43DB1-CWE 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
84.2% Excellent
MC Read 32.2
MC Write 32.5
MC Mixed 24.5
85% 29.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 34
SC Mixed 25.1
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 60.4
66% 60.4 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 84.2%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 51 18 144 24.1" 1920 1009 SAM0F90 LC24RG50
Typical ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI Builds (Compare 2,879 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus ASUS TUF Gaming F15 FX506LI_FX506LI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback