Today's hottest deals

Default string

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics3.62% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
SystemDefault string  (all builds)
MotherboardDefault Default string
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231219
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 03:10
Run Duration141 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel N100
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 0.8 GHz, turbo 2.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
41.3% Average
Memory 53.7
1-Core 75.3
2-Core 145
51% 91.2 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 228
24% 193 Pts
64-Core 238
15% 238 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 62%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Intel(8086 7270) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.5084
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
3.62% Terrible
Lighting 3.7
Reflection 6.3
Parallax 4.2
3% 4.73 fps
MRender 8.5
Gravity 4.6
Splatting 5
5% 6.03 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.62%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Foresee 512GB SSD 512GB
441GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN14546
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 367
Write 367
Mixed 332
79% 355 MB/s
4K Read 22.7
4K Write 40.7
4K Mixed 27.3
91% 30.2 MB/s
DQ Read 202
DQ Write 238
DQ Mixed 262
186% 234 MB/s
Poor: 55% Great: 241%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT16G56C46S5.M8G1 1x16GB
1 of 1 slots used
16GB SODIMM 22h 5600 MHz clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
43.1% Average
MC Read 11.8
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.5
46% 16.3 GB/s
SC Read 7.3
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 11
27% 9.37 GB/s
Latency 151
26% 151 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 43.1%
Great: 93%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 22 1 60 27" 1280 720 AOC2702 Q27G2G4
Typical string Builds (Compare 15,299 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Default string

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 90% - Excellent Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback