Today's hottest deals

MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Boot Drive52.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C37
MotherboardMSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37)  (all builds)
Memory7.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210125
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 03:08
Run Duration128 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 27%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 5600G-$135
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.7 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
81.5% Excellent
Memory 68.4
1-Core 136
2-Core 282
86% 162 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 803
81% 656 Pts
64-Core 947
59% 947 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 81.5%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA400M8240G 240GB
137GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK62B3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 98 118 122 86 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 376
Write 200
Mixed 269
SusWrite 107
53% 238 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 33
4K Mixed 21.3
82% 26.3 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 118
DQ Mixed 144
106% 141 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 91%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$48
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 130 134 132 144 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74% Very good
Read 132
Write 163
Mixed 65.8
SusWrite 126
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.8
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
97% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 74%
Great: 106%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (28th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
72.7% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 23.9
MC Mixed 25.7
74% 26 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 26.2
SC Mixed 22.2
67% 23.4 GB/s
Latency 98.9
40% 98.9 ns
Poor: 61%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 2 24 8 64 0" 1280 720
Typical MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) Builds (Compare 10,807 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI MPG X570 GAMING PLUS (MS-7C37) - $179

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 93% - Outstanding Total price: $929
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback