Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive31.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory19.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20190715
Uptime19.2 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 03:07
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU9%
Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9400F-$85
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
87.2% Excellent
Memory 86.4
1-Core 120
2-Core 241
83% 149 Pts
4-Core 476
8-Core 673
72% 574 Pts
64-Core 694
43% 694 Pts
Poor: 72%
This bench: 87.2%
Great: 91%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$209
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 536.23
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
71.9% Very good
Lighting 95.8
Reflection 89.9
Parallax 79.2
78% 88.3 fps
MRender 65.8
Gravity 80.7
Splatting 72.8
60% 73.1 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.9%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Maxtor Z1 SSD 240GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: STKSF010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 147 35 106 52 83 87 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
31.8% Below average
Read 262
Write 100
Mixed 91
SusWrite 84.9
30% 135 MB/s
4K Read 18.6
4K Write 24.9
4K Mixed 8.3
52% 17.3 MB/s
DQ Read 24.6
DQ Write 23.8
DQ Mixed 22.6
17% 23.7 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 31.8%
Great: 86%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
153GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 109 111 110 111 112 110 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
81.3% Excellent
Read 172
Write 158
Mixed 80.6
SusWrite 110
96% 130 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 2.7
4K Mixed 1.2
238% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 81.3%
Great: 109%
Terramas TDAS 8TB
6.5TB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 41 41 41 41 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
22.8% Poor
Read 37.7
Write 40.9
Mixed 36.7
SusWrite 41.1
29% 39.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.4
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0
109% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.8%
Great: 93%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSE.16FBD Hynix HMAA1GU6CJR6N-XN Adata Kingston 9905702-017.A00G 32GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
77.5% Very good
MC Read 28.3
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 25.1
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 22.2
64% 22.5 GB/s
Latency 72.3
55% 72.3 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 27" 1280 720 ACR02CA S271HL
Typical TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 4,555 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 66%
Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Asus TUF B365M-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 104% - Outstanding Total price: $416
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback