Today's hottest deals

Asrock B560M-C

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 57%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics60.4% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardAsrock B560M-C  (all builds)
Memory9.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 02:58
Run Duration126 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1650S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400F-$100
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
Memory 83.9
1-Core 150
2-Core 293
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 524
8-Core 852
84% 688 Pts
64-Core 1,021
63% 1,021 Pts
Poor: 88%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super)-$295
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3100 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (78th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
60.4% Good
Lighting 77.5
Reflection 117
Parallax 76.8
63% 90.5 fps
MRender 67.1
Gravity 73.5
Splatting 62.5
55% 67.7 fps
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.4%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Neo Forza NFS011SA356-6007000 256GB
144GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T0910A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 331 69 30 102 66 70 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 497
Write 416
Mixed 411
SusWrite 112
80% 359 MB/s
4K Read 30.3
4K Write 104
4K Mixed 29.6
139% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 145
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 47.6
85% 162 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 92%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
524GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 63 72 67 65 67 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
25.1% Poor
Read 22.4
Write 45.6
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 65
29% 39.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
72% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 25.1%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc TEAMGROUP-UD4-3200 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
58.9% Above average
MC Read 28.1
MC Write 17
MC Mixed 16.4
59% 20.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 16.8
SC Mixed 19.1
52% 18.4 GB/s
Latency 76.1
52% 76.1 ns
Poor: 71%
This bench: 58.9%
Great: 112%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 47 30 60 28.9" 1280 720 VIZ0019 VA19L HDTV10T
Typical B560M-C Builds (Compare 4,369 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 100%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock B560M-C

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $280
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback