Today's hottest deals

Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 129%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics210% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory26.4 GB free of 32 GB
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240808
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 02 '24 at 01:29
Run Duration215 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-13600K-$239
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 14 cores, 20 threads
Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
129% Outstanding
Memory 90.7
1-Core 233
2-Core 467
136% 264 Pts
4-Core 898
8-Core 1,457
144% 1,177 Pts
64-Core 2,358
146% 2,358 Pts
Poor: 117%
This bench: 129%
Great: 128%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-Ti-$660
CLim: 2160 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 472.12
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
210% Outstanding
Lighting 307
Reflection 298
Parallax 324
250% 310 fps
MRender 357
Gravity 253
Splatting 192
210% 268 fps
Poor: 162%
This bench: 210%
Great: 225%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$140
931GB free
Firmware: RVT04B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 475
Write 449
Mixed 423
100% 449 MB/s
4K Read 36.7
4K Write 136
4K Mixed 64.6
210% 79.2 MB/s
DQ Read 376
DQ Write 322
DQ Mixed 345
260% 348 MB/s
Poor: 81% Great: 133%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$99
931GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,380
Write 2,132
Mixed 1773
466% 2,095 MB/s
4K Read 68.5
4K Write 260
4K Mixed 116
390% 148 MB/s
DQ Read 2,334
DQ Write 1,822
DQ Mixed 1,989
1,512% 2,048 MB/s
Poor: 188% Great: 410%
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 2TB-$160
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,985
Write 4134
Mixed 2,780
672% 2,966 MB/s
4K Read 77.8
4K Write 278
4K Mixed 130
431% 162 MB/s
DQ Read 2,336
DQ Write 1,806
DQ Mixed 2,034
1,531% 2,058 MB/s
Poor: 286% Great: 587%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$30
931GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 196
Write 190
Mixed 108
122% 164 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.3
254% 1.87 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 32GB
29GB free, PID 6544
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 39.3
Write 3
Mixed 12
17% 18.1 MB/s
4K Read 7.5
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0.8
55% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL TZ/RJ/FX DDR5 6400 C36 2x16GB-$83
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 6000 MHz
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
193% Outstanding
MC Read 80.7
MC Write 75.8
MC Mixed 71.8
217% 76.1 GB/s
SC Read 21.7
SC Write 54.4
SC Mixed 30.7
102% 35.6 GB/s
Latency 66.1
60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 136%
This bench: 193%
Great: 201%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 0P 3R 2G 2B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 30% 23 216 56 170 32" 2048 1152 ACR0775 XB323U
Typical ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 6,661 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 232%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 116%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 273%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z690-E GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 114% - Outstanding Total price: $1,209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback