Today's hottest deals

MSI PRO B760M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 26%
Raft
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 106%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics16.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.7% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMicro-Star MS-7D48
MotherboardMSI PRO B760M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)  (all builds)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20231113
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 22:43
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-12400-$137
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Memory 85.5
1-Core 184
2-Core 356
110% 208 Pts
4-Core 675
8-Core 1,022
105% 848 Pts
64-Core 1,231
76% 1,231 Pts
Poor: 91%
This bench: 106%
Great: 106%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1443 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 536.23
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
16.7% Very poor
Lighting 0.2
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 64.3
0% 44.8 fps
MRender 67.3
Gravity 61.4
Splatting 52.9
49% 60.5 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 16.7%
Great: 54%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Ultra II 240GB-$35
90GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X31200RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 178 124 85 111 109 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
86.7% Excellent
Read 435
Write 313
Mixed 209
SusWrite 131
60% 272 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 36.1
157% 62.4 MB/s
DQ Read 341
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 235
197% 286 MB/s
Poor: 58%
This bench: 86.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
111% Outstanding
MC Read 42.5
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 37.5
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 25.9
SC Write 43.7
SC Mixed 31.9
97% 33.8 GB/s
Latency 81.2
49% 81.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 111%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 69 56 60 21.5" 1280 720 AOC2250 2250W
Typical PRO B760M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48) Builds (Compare 449 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 122%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 114%
UFO

Motherboard: MSI PRO B760M-E DDR4 (MS-7D48)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $411
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback