Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 43%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (12th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 88 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive93.3% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
7 days ago, 7 days ago.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK M3504YA
Memory10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2880 x 1620 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231012
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration118 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 7730U
FP6, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
36.7% Below average
Memory 32.7
1-Core 65.9
2-Core 121
40% 73.3 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 369
36% 294 Pts
64-Core 645
40% 645 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 36.7%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Asus(1043 1883) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 22.20.46.24
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
10% Very poor
Lighting 8.6
Reflection 15.8
Parallax 26.8
7% 17.1 fps
MRender 13.5
Gravity 22.2
Splatting 21.4
16% 19 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 10%
Great: 18%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_2400_MTFDKBA512QFM 512GB
214GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3MA003
SusWrite @10s intervals: 385 612 613 634 680 719 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 768
Write 155
Mixed 156
SusWrite 607
93% 422 MB/s
4K Read 22.8
4K Write 14.8
4K Mixed 9.3
54% 15.6 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 49.1
DQ Mixed 88.2
98% 177 MB/s
Poor: 124%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 252%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 Hynix HMAG68EXNSA051N 16GB
3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
49.4% Average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 16
50% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.4
SC Write 23
SC Mixed 19
55% 19.1 GB/s
Latency 238
17% 238 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 120 15.5" 1280 720 SDC4180
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 16%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 15%
Surfboard

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop M3504YA_M3504YA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback