Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI II

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (19th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 81 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 120%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics211% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI II  (all builds)
Memory39.9 GB free of 64 GB @ 4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240808
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 22:42
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing way below expectations (19th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-14700K-$355
LGA1700, 1 CPU, 20 cores, 28 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 5.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
120% Outstanding
Memory 70.8
1-Core 228
2-Core 456
127% 251 Pts
4-Core 902
8-Core 1,625
152% 1,264 Pts
64-Core 3,697
229% 3,697 Pts
Poor: 125%
This bench: 120%
Great: 134%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,148
Gigabyte(1458 4043) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 561.09
Performing below potential (53rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
211% Outstanding
Lighting 310
Reflection 307
Parallax 330
252% 316 fps
MRender 358
Gravity 256
Splatting 193
211% 269 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 211%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 990 Pro M.2 4TB-$280
3.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4B2QJXD7
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2028
Write 4,418
Mixed 3,394
744% 3,280 MB/s
4K Read 92.7
4K Write 241
4K Mixed 134
440% 156 MB/s
DQ Read 1,532
DQ Write 1,030
DQ Mixed 1,284
958% 1,282 MB/s
Poor: 303% Great: 616%
Samsung Flash Drive 128GB
25GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 168
Write 32.3
Mixed 65.4
89% 88.7 MB/s
4K Read 5
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 1.7
127% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 103%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB DDR5 6400 C32 2x32GB-$209
2 of 4 slots used
63GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4000 MHz
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
133% Outstanding
MC Read 50.2
MC Write 52.7
MC Mixed 50.3
146% 51.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 49.7
SC Mixed 27.8
91% 31.9 GB/s
Latency 97.5
41% 97.5 ns
Poor: 141%
This bench: 133%
Great: 229%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 60 23.8" 1280 720 AUS2464 PA247CV
Typical TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI II Builds (Compare 62 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 293%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 120%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 323%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B760M-PLUS WIFI II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $990
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback