Today's hottest deals

MSI MS-16JF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 60.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics29.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive69.7% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GV62 8RD
MotherboardMSI MS-16JF  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20180601
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 21:23
Run Duration133 Seconds
Run User BRB-User
Background CPU 15%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.75 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
60.3% Good
Memory 74.2
1-Core 66
2-Core 148
56% 95.9 Pts
4-Core 252
8-Core 389
40% 320 Pts
64-Core 398
25% 398 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 60.3%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti (Mobile)
MSI(1462 1221) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 32.0.15.6109
Performing below potential (54th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
29.3% Poor
Lighting 37.1
Reflection 39.7
Parallax 38.3
30% 38.4 fps
MRender 38.2
Gravity 39.6
Splatting 26.5
28% 34.8 fps
Poor: 21%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 31%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WDC WDBNCE5000PNC 500GB
60GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 415020RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 215 203 218 50 117 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
69.7% Good
Read 375
Write 302
Mixed 238
SusWrite 164
60% 270 MB/s
4K Read 23.7
4K Write 47
4K Mixed 30.6
100% 33.8 MB/s
DQ Read 330
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 231
193% 279 MB/s
Poor: 69%
This bench: 69.7%
Great: 115%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI26D4S9S8ME-8 Transcend TS2666HSB-8G 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61.5% Good
MC Read 25.5
MC Write 23.5
MC Mixed 19.7
65% 22.9 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 15.3
SC Mixed 14.9
37% 13.1 GB/s
Latency 81.8
49% 81.8 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 55 60 0" 1280 720 Default
Typical MS-16JF Builds (Compare 613 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI MS-16JF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $218Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback