Today's hottest deals

Biostar B560MHP 2.0

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 92%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (77th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 23 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics88.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive274% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardBiostar B560MHP 2.0  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20221117
Uptime8.7 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 21:22
Run Duration113 Seconds
Run User PHL-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (77th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-10700F-$226
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
98.7% Outstanding
Memory 92.5
1-Core 143
2-Core 284
95% 173 Pts
4-Core 562
8-Core 1,108
99% 835 Pts
64-Core 1,466
91% 1,466 Pts
Poor: 79%
This bench: 98.7%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-$299
ASRock(1849 5217) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 23.10.2
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
88.4% Excellent
Lighting 88.3
Reflection 135
Parallax 174
72% 132 fps
MRender 196
Gravity 90.5
Splatting 155
120% 147 fps
Poor: 79%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 93%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung MZVL4512HBLU 512GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HXC70W1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1604 1748 1768 1792 1288 241 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
274% Outstanding
Read 2,052
Write 1,773
Mixed 1,529
SusWrite 1,407
379% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 52.8
4K Write 106
4K Mixed 66
220% 74.8 MB/s
DQ Read 994
DQ Write 703
DQ Mixed 889
653% 862 MB/s
Poor: 95%
This bench: 274%
Great: 347%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Kingston 16GB
3200, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
79.2% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 29.5
MC Mixed 22.8
79% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 36.1
SC Mixed 26.1
76% 26.5 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 65%
This bench: 79.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 68 56 144 27" 1920 1009 INN0027 ATLAS HD 275C
Typical B560MHP 2.0 Builds (Compare 105 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 89%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 81%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Biostar B560MHP 2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $374
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $140
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $380WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i7-14700K $355Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback