Today's hottest deals

Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 123%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics7.13% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B650M GAMING WIFI  (all builds)
Memory9 GB free of 16 GB @ 4.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20240828
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateOct 01 '24 at 11:24
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 9600X-$279
AM5, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.9 GHz, turbo 5.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
123% Outstanding
Memory 79.8
1-Core 231
2-Core 461
131% 257 Pts
4-Core 894
8-Core 1447
143% 1,170 Pts
64-Core 1,704
106% 1,704 Pts
Poor: 103%
This bench: 123%
Great: 130%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Gigabyte(1458 D000) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 24.10.24
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
7.13% Terrible
Lighting 6.7
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 12.5
6% 10.2 fps
MRender 6.6
Gravity 8
Splatting 20.1
10% 11.6 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 7.13%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
881GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731100WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 3,648
Write 4,105
Mixed 3,007
802% 3,586 MB/s
4K Read 69.8
4K Write 231
4K Mixed 90.5
344% 130 MB/s
DQ Read 2,524
DQ Write 2,059
DQ Mixed 2,270
1,706% 2,284 MB/s
Poor: 249% Great: 623%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata AX5U5200C3816G-BLARWH 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM 22h clocked @ 4800 MHz
Performing below potential (32nd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
81.4% Excellent
MC Read 31.6
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 26.9
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 30.4
SC Write 29.5
SC Mixed 28.3
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 79.2
50% 79.2 ns
Poor: 80%
This bench: 81.4%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 3: 0P 0R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
3% 5% 19 108 55 180 23.8" 1920 1009 ACR0DE1 VG240Y M3
Typical GA-B650M GAMING WIFI Builds (Compare 43 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 217%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 108%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 206%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B650M GAMING WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 86% - Excellent Total price: $590
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $155Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $375WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $239Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback