Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

Performance Results


Gaming 78% Battleship	Desktop 91% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 73% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	121% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	128GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 128GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago, 6 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus TUF X299 MARK 1 (all builds)
Memory	122.3 GB free of 128 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20171229
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jan 18 '18 at 06:01
Run Duration	273 Seconds
Run User	ISR-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (68^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-7800X-$216 22,334 User benchmarks, average bench 78% LGA 2066 R4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	84.4% Excellent	Memory 77.5 1-Core 124 2-Core 248 82% 150 Pts	4-Core 490 8-Core 768 78% 629 Pts	64-Core 1024 63% 1024 Pts
Poor: 69% ↑ This bench: 84.4% Great: 87%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3301) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 390.65 Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	85.7% Excellent	Lighting 108 Reflection 113 Parallax 97.2 88% 106 fps	MRender 97.3 Gravity 99.4 Splatting 100 81% 98.9 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 85.7% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Crucial_CT1050MX300SSD1 1TB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 913GB free Firmware: MU04 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (90^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 2 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 19854 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 926 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 4 (AE) Unknown 100 100 147 (B4) Unknown 0 0 10392 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 57 184684445722 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 9800502743 (F7) Unknown 100 100 306386040 (F8) Unknown 100 100 18722756	84.7% Excellent	Read 494 Write 337 Mixed 311 84% 381 MB/s	4K Read 29.4 4K Write 79.3 4K Mixed 21.2 114% 43.3 MB/s	DQ Read 257 DQ Write 231 DQ Mixed 26.1 79% 171 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 84.7% Great: 85%
Crucial MX300 1TB-$100 21,936 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 792GB free Firmware: M0CR060 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 1616 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 294 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 100 100 2 (AE) Unknown 100 100 12 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 78 55 193274576918 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 100 100 0 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 2573474301 (F7) Unknown 100 100 80519257 (F8) Unknown 100 100 11386013 (B4) Unknown 0 0 4411 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0	87.9% Excellent	Read 483 Write 340 Mixed 341 86% 388 MB/s	4K Read 26.5 4K Write 77.8 4K Mixed 27.7 117% 44 MB/s	DQ Read 344 DQ Write 221 DQ Mixed 54.4 102% 206 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 87.9% Great: 105%
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 165,668 User benchmarks, average bench 213% 465GB free Firmware: 3B7Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	266% Outstanding	Read 2,214 Write 1,375 Mixed 1,383 366% 1,657 MB/s	4K Read 59.2 4K Write 152 4K Mixed 51.2 236% 87.5 MB/s	DQ Read 627 DQ Write 387 DQ Mixed 212 237% 408 MB/s
Poor: 153% ↑ This bench: 266% Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$210 68,849 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 353GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM04B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1700 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 331 (B1) Unknown 99 99 16 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 74 61 26 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 8 (F1) Unknown 99 99 7396258454	121% Outstanding	Read 524 Write 493 Mixed 506 114% 508 MB/s	4K Read 36.8 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 47.8 175% 65 MB/s	DQ Read 385 DQ Write 337 DQ Mixed 170 180% 297 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 121% Great: 124%
Crucial_CT1024MX200SSD1 256GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 238GB free Firmware: MU02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 100 100 0 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 18330 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 658 (AB) Unknown 100 100 0 (AC) Unknown 100 100 0 (AD) Unknown 96 96 141 (AE) Unknown 100 100 246 (B4) Unknown 0 0 2159 (B7) Unknown 100 100 0 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (C2) HDA temperature 74 59 176094511130 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 6 (CA) Data Address Mark errors 96 96 4 (CE) Flying height 100 100 0 (D2) Unknown 100 100 0 (F6) Unknown 100 100 26557528632 (F7) Unknown 100 100 491106609 (F8) Unknown 100 100 1535872700	84.9% Excellent	Read 516 Write 273 Mixed 324 82% 371 MB/s	4K Read 30.3 4K Write 88 4K Mixed 27.3 127% 48.5 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 249 DQ Mixed 40 79% 156 MB/s
Poor: 85% ↑ This bench: 84.9% Great: 85%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7.5TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 64 98900730 (03) Spinup time 88 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 324 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 476589355 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 -41175851465028 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 325 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 81 81 19 (BE) vendor-specific 76 61 404226072 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1624 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2822 (C2) HDA temperature 24 40 73014444056 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 6 98900730 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -85061827295599 (F1) Unknown 100 253 40245496164 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1927643067
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate IronWolf 10TB (2016)-$239 347 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 7TB free Firmware: SC60 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 80 64 93802802 (03) Spinup time 88 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 324 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 476267468 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 56341380990648 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 325 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 99 99 1 (BE) vendor-specific 76 63 404226072 (BF) G-sense error rate 100 100 1988 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2845 (C2) HDA temperature 24 40 77309411352 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 9 7 93802802 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 -120920509249907 (F1) Unknown 100 253 37599369993 (F2) Unknown 100 253 1579545533
Poor: 34% Great: 113%
Seagate SkyHawk 10TB (2016)-$249 71 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 5TB free Firmware: AV01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 72 64 17515894 (03) Spinup time 89 86 0 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 325 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (07) Seek error rate 87 60 483402051 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 58226871633630 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 326 (B8) Unknown 100 100 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BC) Unknown 100 100 0 (BD) vendor-specific 90 90 10 (BE) vendor-specific 74 62 437911578 (BF) G-sense error rate 99 99 2247 (C0) Power-off retract count 100 100 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 99 99 2869 (C2) HDA temperature 26 40 73014444058 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 10 7 17515894 (C5) Current pending sector count 100 100 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 100 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 100 0 (F0) Head flying hours 100 253 33621003994801 (F1) Unknown 100 253 53232748471 (F2) Unknown 100 253 16773341125
Poor: 32% Great: 109%
WD Red 6TB (2014)-$129 11,340 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 3.5TB free Firmware: 82.00A82 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing below expectations (36^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 214 197 8291 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 336 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 98 98 1724 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 334 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 10 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 200 200 833 (C2) HDA temperature 128 117 24 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 100 253 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 100 253 0	71.3% Very good	Read 130 Write 118 Mixed 112 90% 120 MB/s	4K Read 0.64 4K Write 2.22 4K Mixed 0.25 95% 1.04 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 71.3% Great: 99%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 8x16GB 166 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 8 of 8 slots used 128GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing below potential (13^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	95.2% Outstanding	MC Read 26.6 MC Write 54.3 MC Mixed 31.9 107% 37.6 GB/s	SC Read 7.9 SC Write 25.2 SC Mixed 10.9 42% 14.7 GB/s	Latency 85.4 47% 85.4 ns
Poor: 91% ↑ This bench: 95.2% Great: 138%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical TUF X299 MARK 1 Builds (Compare 695 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 103%

UFO

Desktop 89%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 104%

UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF X299 MARK 1

CPU
Core i7-7820XIntel $375Bench 80%, 28,524 samples	179x
Core i7-7800XIntel $216Bench 78%, 22,334 samples	133x
Core i9-7900XIntel $455Bench 82%, 19,432 samples	121x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	81x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	68x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	39x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	37x
960 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 512GBSamsung $139Bench 266%, 63,520 samples	30x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 213%, 165,668 samples	26x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	40x
Dominator DDR4 2800 C16 8x4GBCorsairBench 113%, 223 samples	19x
F4 DDR4 4000 C15 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 115%, 708 samples	17x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 74% - Very good

Total price: $1,131

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $179	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16