Today's hottest deals

Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 108%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 102%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics110% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive172% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
29 days ago, 29 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory8.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '24 at 07:09
Run Duration206 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5700G-$166
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
96.6% Outstanding
Memory 73.2
1-Core 171
2-Core 340
102% 195 Pts
4-Core 642
8-Core 1,113
106% 877 Pts
64-Core 1,478
92% 1,478 Pts
Poor: 69%
This bench: 96.6%
Great: 105%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6600-XT-$270
Ram: 8GB, Driver: 24.2.1
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
110% Outstanding
Lighting 115
Reflection 140
Parallax 234
94% 163 fps
MRender 227
Gravity 126
Splatting 191
148% 181 fps
Poor: 105%
This bench: 110%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P1 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$108
422GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P3CR013 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 448 83 95 100 55 356 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
172% Outstanding
Read 1476
Write 1,279
Mixed 1,038
SusWrite 189
222% 996 MB/s
4K Read 48.2
4K Write 114
4K Mixed 65.6
218% 76 MB/s
DQ Read 688
DQ Write 836
DQ Mixed 274
342% 599 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 172%
Great: 295%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$69
387GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1834 1630 1635 1639 1630 1608 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
342% Outstanding
Read 2,581
Write 2,448
Mixed 1921
SusWrite 1,663
484% 2,153 MB/s
4K Read 59.7
4K Write 140
4K Mixed 82.9
271% 94.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1,252
DQ Write 1,107
DQ Mixed 1,173
881% 1,177 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 342%
Great: 410%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$35
803GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 185 187 186 188 188 183 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 175
Write 151
Mixed 84.5
SusWrite 186
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
145% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 103%
Great: 113%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Team Group Inc. TEAMGROUP-UD4-3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
77.1% Very good
MC Read 28.8
MC Write 26.1
MC Mixed 28.3
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 20.1
SC Write 26.1
SC Mixed 24.9
68% 23.7 GB/s
Latency 90.8
44% 90.8 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 77.1%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
38% 20% 71 209 56 144 27" 1280 720 VSC0E39 XG2705
History: Score 38: 0P 3R 6G 5B | Score 61: 0P 5R 10G 6B
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 2,383 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $715
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback