Today's hottest deals

Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1404ZA_X1404ZA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics10.2% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive86% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1404ZA_X1404ZA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X1404ZA
Memory1.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20231117
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateSep 16 '24 at 07:08
Run Duration119 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-1215U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 1.75 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Memory 37.9
1-Core 67.9
2-Core 131
43% 78.9 Pts
4-Core 209
8-Core 336
34% 273 Pts
64-Core 346
21% 346 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 1633) 1GB
Driver: <> Ver. 31.0.101.4255
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
10.2% Very poor
Lighting 12
Reflection 14.9
Parallax 13.1
10% 13.3 fps
MRender 11.8
Gravity 15.9
Splatting 12.7
11% 13.5 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 10.2%
Great: 11%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme FORESEE XP2000F128G 128GB
68GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V1223G0P Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 414 469 459 402 409 203 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 622
Write 485
Mixed 437
SusWrite 393
108% 484 MB/s
4K Read 25.8
4K Write 41.4
4K Mixed 21.9
89% 29.7 MB/s
DQ Read 317
DQ Write 137
DQ Mixed 219
164% 224 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86%
Great: 138%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF1G64HZ-3G2F1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
35% Below average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 12.5
MC Mixed 12.1
37% 12.8 GB/s
SC Read 7.8
SC Write 13.1
SC Mixed 9.5
29% 10.1 GB/s
Latency 223
18% 223 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 35%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0P 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 53 24 60 13.9" 1280 720 CMN14E5
Typical Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1404ZA_X1404ZA Builds (Compare 44 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus Vivobook_ASUSLaptop X1404ZA_X1404ZA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $299WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $112Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $389WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $225Nvidia RTX 4070 $500Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $350
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback